
Raphael Warnock, center, and Jon Ossoff attend a rally in Garden City, Georgia, on December 19.
Photographer: Colin Douglas Gray / Bloomberg
Photographer: Colin Douglas Gray / Bloomberg
Investors are not yet ready to leave this chaotic year behind. There is one more persistent risk event to worry about: the final races of the 2020 elections that have spread over the next year.
While not as pronounced as the hedging seen on election day last month, volatility options and futures signal heightened concern about the potential market turmoil resulting from the results of the January 5 races in Georgia that will determine whether Republicans will retain control of the Senate.
Before the November vote, many considered a Democratic sweep in the elections to be one of the most optimistic results possible for US actions. Since then, however, the market has been comfortable with a possible continuous division of government control – a scenario that has historically produced solid returns.
“There is no doubt that if you move from red to blue, you will have to set the price for something that looks less favorable because of markets that like congestion, markets that like the status quo,” said Phil Camporeale, managing director multi-asset solutions for JPMorgan Asset Management.
The focus on the runoff – and the demand for hedges to protect against turbulence in its aftermath – is centered on uncertainty about exactly how investors should position themselves before a Joe Biden presidency. He needs Democratic control of the Senate to execute an agenda that would boost green energy companies at the expense of fossil fuel producers, while probably leading to more economic aid packages and infrastructure spending. However, it can also help you to raise the corporate tax rate and increase regulatory scrutiny.
“It is impossible to overstate the importance of these elections for the size, scale and speed of 2021 fiscal, tax and regulatory policy,” wrote Chris Krueger, an analyst at Cowen, in a note on December 21.
Hedges in Place
There are potential winners and losers in both scenarios and it is debatable which would be the best scenario for the stock market in general in the long run. But traders appear to be protecting themselves against volatility that could explode in the short term if Georgia’s results cause investors to pile up on the perceived beneficiaries of the result and get rid of the perceived losers.
The coverage probably also reflects the concern that even small surprises could create turmoil in a stock market that needs the general public to continue investing after a spectacular run. The S&P 500 rose 65% from its low in March, with a variety of valuation metrics at their highest in a decade or more.
“The idea that fiscal policy and public procurement can be more important than earnings and revenue – looks a lot like 2020, doesn’t it? – it is instinctively uncomfortable and supports the persistence of above-normal volatility, ”wrote Julian Emanual, stock strategist at brokerage BTIG, in a recent note.
Biden’s shares will have history and food in their favor, not much more
The second round in Georgia was launched after no candidate for the two seats in the state Senate won a majority of the vote. Republican David Perdue is running for re-election against Jon Ossoff, while Senator Kelly Loeffler faces Democrat Raphael Warnock. Polls show fierce competition between Republican and Democratic candidates, while the PredictIt betting market shows a small advantage for Republicans. President Donald Trump’s last-minute demand for increased payments to Americans as part of a Covid-19 aid package is also a wildcard that could affect the vote.
The proximity of the races prevented investors from being too confident about what to expect at the start of the Biden government. If the Democrats win both contests, it will give them control of the Senate with the help of Vice President-elect Kamala Harris’ tiebreaker votes. (Two independent senators agree with the Democrats.)
“We see the two elections as very close to calling,” said Tom Hainlin, strategist at the US Bank Wealth Management’s Ascent Private Wealth Group, adding that “some short-term market volatility is possible” after the vote if Democrats occupy both the chairs.
Evercore ISI strategists say the Cboe Volatility Index futures curve remains “remarkably steep” due to events in Georgia, similar to the situation approaching the November races.

The VIX futures curve on December 23
Meanwhile, the distortion in the S&P 500’s one-month put options, or a cost measure in bearish options, was at the 92nd percentile of a historic range, according to data compiled by Nomura Securities. “The focus is on protection after a hellish race, and ahead of the risk of macro regime change as the Georgia Senate runoff approaches,” wrote Charlie McElligott, Nomura’s cross-asset strategist, in a recent note for customers.
Many in the market assume that Republican candidates will retain both seats, said Ryan Detrick, chief market strategist at LPL Financial, so any surprise “could upset the apple market”.
Disturbed things
LPL research found that a divided Congress has historically been good for the stock market – for the past seven decades, the S&P 500 returned an average of 17.2% per year when power was divided between the two parties. This compares to a 10.7% advance when Democrats were in charge and 13.4% with Republicans in charge of both chambers.

The activity is also warming in the Treasury options market, highlighted by a contrary bet that emerged on Monday night. The bet was against the potential for aggressive fiscal stimulus to drive a defeat at the long end of the bond market, and it is worth it if any increase in yields is limited to about 10 basis points from current levels for approximately the next month. the bet leans against a theme that has been gaining momentum in Treasury options – that the liquidation of Georgia could trigger a strong sale of Treasury bills.
The treasury options market comes alive with the proximity of Georgia outlets
Certainly, many on Wall Street do not see racing in Georgia as a game changer. A small majority of Democrats in the Senate may not necessarily mean an immediate introduction of new policies, including a reformulation of tax rates, according to Art Hogan, chief market strategist at National Securities Corp.
“I just don’t think this is playing on the idea of ’My God, higher corporate taxes right away and huge changes.’ I think it is much more of a centrist mentality that we can have some gradual changes, ”said Hogan by phone. “The market narrative changed very quickly, too, after the election, saying, ‘Hey, wait a minute, we didn’t get the blue wave, but we have a new president and with that probably comes a calmer presence around international relations and tariffs and trade and more normalization. ‘I think the market has accommodated this concept. “
– With the help of Lu Wang and Sarah Ponczek