The impeachment witness, Vindman, says he “should have sued Trump’s prosecutors” and the right-wing media

Retired lieutenant colonel Alexander Vindman, who testified at former President Trump’s first impeachment trial, said he “should have prosecuted those who expanded his smear campaign.”

Driving the news: In an opinion piece for Lawfare, entitled “Can litigation help to de-radicalize the right-wing media?”, Vindman wrote: “After testifying about the improper conduct of then President Trump in Ukraine before the House impeachment investigation, Trump and his allies targeted me and my family for retribution. “

Receive market news worthy of your time with Axios Markets. Sign up for free.

  • He said that “Trump’s proxies have broadened these themes in the news on television, the internet and social media, resulting in risks to my life and reputation as a public servant, and that he” has not responded strongly to threats and defamation. “

Of importance: Some First Amendment advocates fear that defamation suits could be used as a means to silence the press. And Vindman notes in his article that the First Amendment “severely limits the tools available to seek accountability from the right-wing media.”

  • “However, there are ways to dismantle the right-wing disinformation ecosystem, an ecosystem that does not start with insurrection, but with more mundane lies,” he added.

  • “Like many political elites who drive the insurrection to promote their political goals, the right-wing media is also motivated by a financial calculation: viewers, market share and advertising funds.”

Our thought bubble, via Sara Fischer: Axios defamation lawsuits and threats against Fox and other conservative personalities and networks have so far proved effective in combating electoral fraud.

More from Axios: Sign up for the latest market trends with Axios Markets. Sign up for free

Source