NRA goes to Texas, but may not be able to hide with bankruptcy

Wayne LaPierre

O The National Rifle Association is about to find out what happens when its unrestricted adoption of the Second Amendment clashes with the United States Bankruptcy Code.

The group is trying to circumvent New York regulators and the state’s fraud process by filing for bankruptcy in Dallas and moving to Texas, which is gun-friendly, claiming support for the right to bear arms. But the case opened last week could face a series of legal challenges at an initial hearing on Wednesday, which could undermine the NRA’s plan or even compound its problems.

Opponents may ask for the case to be dismissed entirely, as the NRA says it is not really bankrupt. If the case goes ahead, the usual disclosures could expose more internal NRA matters to the scrutiny of critics, including Letitia James, New York attorney general. James is suing to dissolve the organization and accusing leader Wayne LaPierre and three others of stealing it. LaPierre contested the New York allegations.

Letitia James GETTY sub

“I looked at it and just laughed,” said Thomas J. Salerno, a Phoenix-based partner who specializes in corporate bankruptcy with the law firm Stinson LLP. Texas may have a pro-gun reputation, but bankruptcy judges there are appointed federals who will follow the law, not local politics, said Salerno. At best, the NRA can only delay the New York investigation, he said.

The NRA will be presented to the court today before US bankruptcy judge Harlin D. Hale in Dallas. Although he is unlikely to make any final decisions during the hearing, the judge may decide to dismiss the case, as the NRA said it is not insolvent or bankrupt and told members that the group is in “its best financial condition in years” .

The court documents show assets of about $ 203 million – mostly in cash, investments, accounts receivable and its headquarters – against liabilities of $ 153 million. The revenue in 2020 fell 7% in relation to the previous year; the NRA said it cut expenses by 23% and asked employees who stayed on the job to accept cut wages.

Political environment

On a statement announcing the request, the NRA said it had filed for bankruptcy to escape “the toxic New York political environment” and regroup in Texas, allowing “to simplify costs and expenses”.

“If you take what the NRA is saying at face value, it makes a strong case for the case to be dismissed for lack of good faith,” said Robert Lawless, a professor at the University of Illinois School of Law. “They will have to provide some financial reasons for doing so.”

The NRA gave a slightly different explanation in court documents. “To be clear: the NRA is not trying to escape regulatory oversight,” said the group. “However, he cannot allow his constitutional rights to be trampled on or his existence destroyed by political vengeance.” He said that the Constitution guarantees people the right to freedom of expression, to carry weapons for self-defense “and to seek a new start in the bankruptcy court, when appropriate. The successful reorganization of the NRA in Texas will assert and promote all of these rights. “

According to the United States Bankruptcy Code, a company that reorganizes can leave behind legal liabilities linked to civil proceedings. This would require Hale to approve a reorganization plan that would free the newly reorganized NRA and its executives from the lawsuits New York is taking in its lawsuit. These conclusions can be challenged by creditors and appealed to a higher court.

.Source