Uber can stop allowing drivers to see destinations and price names

A year ago, Uber allowed its drivers in California to see travel destinations before picking up passengers and allowed them to set prices in an effort to prove that drivers were actually independent contractors. It was part of the company’s strategy to prevent drivers from being reclassified as employees under AB5, California’s street work law.

Uber is now recognizing that the change has hurt business and is considering cutting back on its visible destinations and pricing policies, The Chronicle found. The seesaw can disappoint drivers who have enjoyed this extra control over their work.

Many drivers choose profitable races and refuse other orders, making the service unreliable, the San Francisco company said on Monday. Uber no longer has to worry about proving that drivers are hired independently, because Proposition 22 – the November electoral measure by which Uber and other show companies spent $ 220 million to approve – enshrines its status as non-employees.

“Uber is reevaluating the previous changes we made in California so that we can make it more reliable,” the company told The Chroncle.

In January 2020, days after the AB5 went into effect, Uber made the changes, saying they were “due to new state laws” and warning riders that they might have a harder time finding a ride. AB5 makes it more difficult for companies to claim that workers are not employees. It is based on a test that says workers are employed, unless they work free from the company’s control, do not work at the core of the company’s core business, and have their own independent companies in that line of work.

Uber’s goal was to show that drivers had more freedom and flexibility and therefore met these requirements. Drivers could set their own price as a multiple of an Uber base price, see where passengers were going and reject travel requests without penalty. Passengers no longer saw prices before a trip.

Uber argued in court last summer that drivers’ ability to see destinations and set prices meant that they were really independent. California and three city prosecutors are suing Uber and rival Lyft over the driver’s rating on AB5, in a case that continues, but will now only review the conduct before Proposal 22 goes into effect.

But in the streets, the shot backfired. A third of California’s drivers have cut more than 80% of their ride orders, making the service unreliable, Uber said this week. About a fifth of potential passengers in California now end up not finding a trip, an increase of seven times over the previous one. The pandemic has further restricted the number of drivers, who now have to face the risk of the virus.

Source