Indian court overrides blocking future Amazon retail sale to Reliance

An Indian court on Monday overturned an order that would have prevented Reliance Industries – a major Amazon (AMZN) rival – buying the Retail of the Future.

The Delhi High Court ruled only last week that Future Retail’s $ 3.3 billion sale should be suspended. Although the court noted that his trial has not yet been final, said “immediate orders” were needed to protect Amazon’s rights and ordered all parties involved in the deal “to keep [the] status quo “while deliberating.

This week, however, another bank in the same court decided there was no need to delay the deal after Future Group appealed. The judge has yet to pronounce the final order, but for now Future Retail and Reliance Industries are at an advantage.

Future Retail’s shares jumped 10% on Tuesday.

Amazon gets court to block $ 3.3 billion retail deal involving India's richest man
The decision is the latest development in what appears to be a proxy battle between two of the richest men in the world for India’s growing online shopping market. What is at stake is strategic access to a network of popular grocery stores and other retailers in India, something that Jeff Bezos’ Amazon and Reliance – owned by India’s richest man, Mukesh Ambani – want to have for themselves or to prevent the other buy.

At the heart of the fight is Future Retail, the dairy cow of the Indian conglomerate Future Group. The retail unit includes brands such as Big Bazaar, a popular supermarket chain.

Amazon and Walmart dominate India’s e-commerce sector. But Ambani has ambitions to challenge that with JioMart, his online grocery platform that is expected to span everything from electronics and clothing to pharmaceuticals and healthcare.

In August 2019, Amazon invested in a Future Group entity that gave it an approximately 4.8% stake in Future Retail on September 30 last year, according to securities records. The deal gave Amazon the right of first refusal to acquire more shares in Future Retail, according to one of the documents.

Amazon argued that the 2019 agreement between it and Future Group included a non-compete clause, a person familiar with Amazon’s thinking told CNN Business last October. The clause listed 30 restricted parties with which Future Retail and Future Group could not do business, and Reliance was on that list, the person said.

People leaving a Big Bazaar store in Mumbai in November.  Future Retail owns the popular supermarket chain.
Amazon sought to enforce this agreement through the Singapore International Arbitration Center (SIAC), with the Southeast Asian country often seen as a neutral jurisdiction to resolve disputes. The SIAC emergency arbitrator ordered a temporary suspension of the deal last October.
Although the Future Group raised questions about the validity of the Singapore referee’s order in India, the Delhi Supreme Court declared last week that the order is “enforceable” and put the deal on hold.

While Monday’s last move allows the deal to continue, the battle is far from over. The Delhi Supreme Court has yet to render its final decision, which could undermine Reliance and Future’s plans once again, according to Bharat Chugh, a Supreme Court lawyer specializing in arbitration law.

Ultimately, the country’s Supreme Court could hear the case, if either party appealed. Future Retail, Reliance and Amazon did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

– CNN’s Rishi Iyengar contributed to this report.

.Source