INDIANÁPOLIS – Gonzaga’s guard, Jalen Suggs, with a 40-foot buzzer-buzzer to the top of UCLA on Saturday night in the Final Four provided a generational moment for the NCAA tournament. This electrified Twitter, sparked countless reenactments of TikTok and will live forever on prominent rollers.
While college athletics and the NCAA tournament are on the verge of unprecedented change next year, Suggs’ shot raises a new question for the college sports scene: how much is a moment like this worth? And how could the next epic buzzer-beater be monetized, given that NCAA sports are on the verge of an era when athletes can profit from their name, image and likeness?
This issue will be brought to the forefront next year, according to the NCAA, the Supreme Court and countless politicians are trying to figure out how college athletes can take advantage of their NIL. While the details are still unclear, university athletics leaders hope that next season there will be some way for top level athletes like Suggs to take advantage of their remarkable moments.
So, how much does a 12 meter buzzer cost to guarantee a spot in the national title game and keep a perfect season alive? And what could the heroes of the 2022 male and female Final Fours receive in compensation?
“It is not an immediate turnaround,” said Zach Soskin, co-founder of Voltage Management, who works with athletes and brand consulting. “But over [Suggs’] life, it’s worth millions of dollars. “
Given the NCAA’s lack of clarity, which has endured this problem for years instead of enabling it, it is difficult to make a concise estimate. But it is certain that the moment would be profitable both instantly and later.
“It is really impossible to measure the value, but it raises you for the rest of your life,” said Soskin. “Obviously, Jalen Suggs is not Zion [Williamson]but he joins the league as a bigger star than Anthony Edwards [the No. 1 pick in the 2020 NBA draft]. The average American sports fan just didn’t know who [Suggs] it was before Saturday night. Now he is a hero. “
And these instant heroes will soon enter a fascinating new world that is enveloped in optimism, uncertainty and some concern about the appearance of different things.
How athletes can profit from great moments
It is appropriate to see the future of Name, Image and Similarity through two of the biggest stars in this year’s NCAA men’s and women’s tournament. The fact that UConn’s Jalen Suggs and Paige Bueckers are close friends from his native Minnesota is just a coincidence.
There are two ways of looking at possible sponsorship deals for both, which is instructive as to where college athletics is headed. There is the ability to profit instantly from an iconic moment and leverage academic success for long-term relationships with brands.
Let’s start with Suggs, who has just experienced a rare NCAA moment that combined an impossible buzzer-beater, an undefeated season and the elevated stage of the Final Four. How much could he profit from that in the next 48 hours before the title game started? Could Bank of America, for example, want to capitalize on the bank’s shot?
“I bet a company would pay six digits for him today because he is so hot,” said Peter Miller, founder of marketing group Jabez, who works with professional athletes like Dak Prescott.
But Miller emphasized that the long-term view will be more important than the short-term view. Suggs had 404,000 followers on Instagram on Sunday night. He has 28,000 followers on Twitter. None of these social channels mentioned his moment on Sunday night, but many worked for him. LeBron James, Kevin Love, Dwyane Wade, Lonzo Ball and almost all former Gonzaga basketball students tweeted about his shot.
Miller said that if he was negotiating for Suggs, he would advise him not to do anything soon. Much of the long-term value for Suggs will be increased or decreased depending on whether Gonzaga wins or loses on Monday. He couldn’t shoot a commercial for Gatorade on Sunday and air during the game. “The problem is that his window is too tight,” said Miller. “If they lose against Baylor tomorrow night, it’s all gone. If they win, 10 years from now, people will think that shot won the tournament. “
So, what is the value of a Final Four for a player? In many ways, UConn Bueckers may be able to accumulate more sponsors because of their greater number of followers – 790,000 followers on Instagram – and the platform offered by the powerful female UConn team.
“I think there is a good chance that Paige will make more money than any college athlete next year,” said Soskin. He added that the Iowa women’s phenomenon, Caitlin Clark, “may not be far behind” and that their presence in college basketball next year will raise their eyes in this sport.
“One of the biggest misconceptions at the beginning of the NIL conversation was that it will only be a factor for men,” said Soskin. “Two years ago, Sabrina Ionescu would have beaten all the male players. Next year, Paige will probably go. “
So, how can these athletes make money?
Blake Lawrence, the CEO and co-founder of Opendorse, recites all the ways in which athletes – both stars and players – can end up profiting. He says to imagine Capital One – or any official sponsor – paying players for selfies, TikToks and Instagram stories. Can emerging stars make Cameo videos? Could the stars hold their own press conference on Twitch, with “fans ‘giving tips’ to show their support?” (Imagine the volume of “tips” from grateful – and potentially over-served – fans from Zags if Suggs joined Twitch after the game at the end of Saturday.)
Then there are the local restaurants / bars, car dealerships and souvenir shops in university cities that can attract big business with the appearance of a gambler. Or could a player autograph his shoes worn in the game in a star presentation and sell them?
Lawrence estimates that the “cap” for a top player like Bueckers or Suggs would be around $ 175,000 for the NCAA tournament. (This estimate came before Suggs’ shot, which would clearly be an amplifier.)
What about everyone?
“At the bottom end, $ 10,000 could be won by almost all Final Four players through a combination [of different methods]”Said Lawrence. “At the end of the day, tournament stars can win more than $ 100,000.”
How will it work?
Baylor’s athletic director Mack Rhoades has been excited about the Bears for almost a month here in Indianapolis. He admits that, a year from now, he has no idea what the NCAA tournament or the Colégio Futebol Playoff will look like in the chair of the athletic director.
Part of the ambiguity comes with the NCAA’s lack of guidance on how this drastic change will work. An aura of mystery still looms over the actual execution of how players will handle sponsorships. Will there be, for example, an hour of sponsor time incorporated after the availability of the media? Will brands have creative teams in the College Football Playoff or the Final Four to help players produce content for ads? How will the players’ ability to earn money intersect with training, movies and team meals?
“I think that uncertainty always makes us cautious, probably nervous,” Rhoades said in a telephone interview on Sunday. “We all want to control a situation. It is difficult to control something for which we do not yet have a clear path. I think we all believe that we will get to the other side of this and, hopefully, we will end up in a good place for our institutions and student-athletes. But yes, it’s a little unnerving not to know which way we’re going. “
What made administrators even more nervous is the combination of the unknown NIL rules with the expected approval of the single transfer rules in the coming months. There are already more than 1,000 players on the NCAA basketball transfer portal due to the expected approval of the rules.
“College athletics will change here in the next 12 to 24 months, more than it has changed in the past 10 years,” said Rhoades. “Or it seems so.”
Notre Dame athletic director Jack Swarbrick told Yahoo Sports that the single transfer rule will have more of an impact on how teams are built and what the Four Finals will look like in the future than NIL legislation. The ability to transfer without wasting game time will reshape the lists annually, as we are seeing. And while the specifications for how the NIL will be legislated have not been determined, there is a general sense of how it will be.
“We have understood for a while what it is going to be,” said Swarbrick. “You just have to be fine with this.”
For Skyy Clark, one of the top 10 recruits in the 2022 class who is committed to Kentucky, the future is full of promise and mystery. He’s a potential star in the 2022-23 college basketball season, and that means his family is exploring new avenues while they wait to see what the NIL legislation will look like.
Clark played base ball with Bronny James, which helped raise the number of followers on Instagram to 252,000. And your family is starting to think about how they can take advantage of it.
“We’re just trying to be as proactive as possible,” said Clark’s father, Kenny. “I’ve been talking to various marketing groups and stuff, just trying to prepare for it, so that we can start off on the right foot.”
Suggs’ shooting lesson for future generations may lie in the skillful way he handled the moment. He celebrated with relentless vigor and then described the piece with authenticity and genuineness, reflecting on being a child shooting at his mini-hoop in a way that made him likable and identifiable.
“He handled the moment so well,” said Soskin. “It gave him a platform to show who he was, for people to say, ‘This kid is great.’ “
And this platform, in the near future, will bring a lot of value.
(Krysten Peek contributed to this story.)
More from Yahoo Sports: