House Democrats are engaged in a new effort to pass comprehensive legislation this month, which they say aims to strengthen voting rights, fight voter suppression and gerrymandering, and restrict the use of “dark money” in federal policy.
Republicans, however, said during previous attempts to bring the legislation to a vote that it would give the federal government even more power to decide the representation of the people.
House Resolution 1, or “For The People Act”, is sponsored by Rep. John Sarbanes, D-Md., And co-sponsored by Mayor, Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., And Rep. Zoe Lofgren , D-Calif. .
In a statement on his House page, Sarbanes said that the 2020 election made his legislation even more important, claiming that American voters were forced to “overcome unbridled voter repression, gerrymandering and a torrent of special-interest dark money only. to exercise your vote and your voice in our democracy. “
HR 1 would guarantee “automatic” electoral registration, require states to allow electoral registration on the same day on election day, and target what are often Republican efforts to “clean up” electoral lists of alleged inconsistencies and disparities, as an exercise Georgia that resulted in a contentious court battle.
The bill also includes an item that prohibits ineligible voters from being prosecuted for being “registered by mistake”.
The legislation – first introduced two years ago – would also give independent commissions the task of attracting congressional districts, requiring political groups to disclose expensive donors, creating reporting requirements for online political ads and, in a nod to Democrats, – executing complaint about former President Donald Trump, compel presidents to disclose their tax returns.
The Republican opposition was fierce during the last session. At the time, the then Senate majority leader, Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., Labeled it “Democratic Politician Protection Act” and said in an article that Democrats were trying to “change the rules of American politics to benefit a party. “
House minority leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., Also said of the 2019 iteration of the bill at the time that it features a “massive takeover of the federal government that would undermine the integrity of our elections.”
The issue of gerrymandering has become a controversial issue in recent years, including in 2018, when advocates successfully sought a reshaping of Pennsylvania’s congressional districts in the mid-decade, many said they were inclined towards Republican representation.
The Supreme Court of the state with a democratic majority subsequently overturned the drawn map of the 2010 ten-year census and redesigned the districts, resulting in a 9-9 split between the 18 legislators of the Commonwealth House – a 3 reduction for the Republican Party compared previous elections.
HR 1 district sponsor Sarbanes gained national attention in its own weird way.
A federal court judge in a constituency once memorably dubbed Maryland’s 3rd Congressional District, “a pterodactyl with broken wings, prostrate in the center of the state.”
The district curves start from northwest Baltimore near Pikesville, in and around an eastern part of the city, turning southwest again through Elkridge, before making a final east turn, passing through Fort Meade and ending at capital Annapolis.
The Sarbanes bill would enact “independent redistricting commissions” based on the state to prevent such gerrymandering in the future.
HR 1 would also change the current policy regarding criminal voting rights at the federal level.
States like Virginia have in the past made their own changes to existing state policies regarding the emancipation of ex-convicts. In 2019, Democratic Governor Ralph Northam announced that his administration restored the voting rights of nearly 11,000 criminals registered with Old Dominion.
The Sarbanes bill would ensure that, unless they are currently behind bars, criminals could not be banned from registering to vote.
Another aspect of RH 1 that is certain to receive Republican scrutiny is a section that commits Congress to advocating the creation of a state in the District of Columbia. Republicans argued that such a decision would guarantee two permanent Democratic seats in the U.S. Senate, in what is a Democratic jurisdiction for Republicans of approximately nine to one.
Currently, he is represented by Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton, DD.C., who cannot vote on the final legislation, but can vote on amendments in committee settings.
“There are no constitutional, historical, fiscal or economic reasons why Americans living in the District of Columbia should not be a state,” says the legislation. It then lists several reasons why district residents should be emancipated at the 50-state level, pointing to the population and the size of their budget in relation to states like Wyoming.
He also notes that a bill, the Washington DC Admission Act, passed the House in 2020 and that it would have predicted that the physical federal district of Washington, DC, would be reduced only to federal buildings and facilities, such as the White House and, therefore, form the “Washington State; Douglass Commonwealth” of the other residential areas of the city.
The “People’s Law” would further prohibit states from enacting restrictive provisions on postal voting efforts and would require 15 days of early voting for federal elections across the country.
In general, state election officials are wary of federal voting requirements. But those serving in Democratic-led states have been more open and want to ensure that Congress provides money to help them make system updates, which the bill does.
“If you still believe in what we all learned in high school government classes, that democracy works best when the largest number of eligible people participate, these are common sense reforms,” said Senator Alex Padilla, a Democrat who oversaw the elections. California elections before being nominated for the seat previously held by Vice President Kamala Harris.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APPLICATION
But Republican officials like Alabama Secretary of State John Merrill remain opposed. Merrill said the federal government’s role is limited and that states should be allowed to innovate and implement their own voting rules.
A recent Wall Street Journal editorial written in opposition to the legislation warned that HR 1 is a Pelosi exercise in “cementing democratic political power”, in association with a bill that aims to establish a Puerto Rican state.
“HR1 imposes California-style electoral rules across the country. The bill requires each state to register voters based on names in state and federal databases – just like anyone who receives food stamps or interacts with a state DMV, ”wrote the council. “In general, the bill was designed to automatically enroll prospective Democratic voters, increase Democratic participation, without any concern for electoral integrity.”
The council added that the project’s campaign finance sections will simply limit conservatives’ freedom of expression through forced disclosure of donor names.
“Left-wing pressure groups and the media will stigmatize donors,” they claim.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.