“I can tell you, as chairman of the (Senate Budget Committee), we have a room full of lawyers working as hard as we can to defend the parliamentarian that, in fact, raising the minimum wage will have significant budgetary implications and, In fact, it must be consistent with the reconciliation rules, “said Sanders, a Vermont independent who joins the Democrats, to CNN’s Jake Tapper in the” State of the Union. ”
Cedric Richmond, a senior adviser to Biden, told MSNBC on Sunday that the government still supports a $ 15 minimum wage and that it supports Sanders’ efforts to keep him on the president’s plan.
Richmond said Biden’s comment about the increase not surviving “was just his prediction of what he thought the Senate would do,” adding: “Sanders assembled a team to present a very convincing argument that he should remain on the bill under the Senate rules. “
Sanders also emphasized the importance of approving a Covid aid package as soon as possible, without falling back on Democratic priorities, including raising the federal minimum wage and a higher income limit for individuals receiving stimulus checks.
“Before we get to what the vice president is going to do, I have to go through the parliamentary and then I have to get 50 votes in favor of raising the minimum wage to $ 15 an hour. I’m working as hard as I can to make that happen. “, he said.
Pressed by Tapper on whether he would be willing to lower the dollar increase amount to ensure he has all the Democratic votes he needs, including that of Senator Joe Manchin, a moderate member of the West Virginia party, Sanders noted that he does not think that a $ 15 federal minimum wage is a “radical idea”. He added that he believes that “at the end of the day” Democrats understand that the provision needs to be approved.
Sanders also doubled his belief that Democrats should not lower the eligibility limit for direct payments to the level that Republicans want. He said he agrees with lawmakers saying they don’t want wealthy individuals to receive the proposed $ 1,400 payments, saying that “what we need to do is have a strong cliff so that it doesn’t spread to people who earn $ 300,000.”
However, he called the desire of some to set the limit on payments for individuals earning $ 50,000 or less “absurd”, noting that he disagrees with this position for political and policy-related reasons.