The agency’s analysis concluded that some of the Trump administration’s CDC guidelines were not science-based or free from undue influence

The agency’s analysis concluded that some of the Trump administration’s CDC guidelines were not science-based or free from undue influence

by

The review concluded that some guidelines “used less direct language than the available supported evidence”, “needed to be updated to reflect the latest scientific evidence” and “presented the underlying scientific basis for guidance inconsistently”, according to the port -voice.

“I am focused on taking the CDC forward with science, transparency and clarity leading the way. It is imperative for the American people to trust the CDC. Otherwise, preventable illnesses and injuries can occur – and, tragically, lives can and will be lost.” , said Walensky in a statement to CNN.

“This agency and its critical health information cannot be vulnerable to undue influence, and this report helps to outline our path to rebuild trust and ensure that the information the CDC shares with the American people is based on solid science that will keep us, our loved ones, and our communities healthy and safe. “

The CDC review was first reported by The Washington Post.
Walensky wrote in the agency’s review of the Trump administration’s guidance that she had some difficulty understanding which guidance documents provided important new updates – and she recommended ways in which the agency under the Biden government can do things differently.

While conducting the review, Walensky wrote that she “found it very difficult” to say whether a new document represented an important or very small update to the existing guidance and to decipher what were the basic recommendations in long documents.

Some documents were also removed or replaced from the CDC website during the review. The revision names the document that had previously been removed as “The Importance of the Reopening of Schools of America this Fall”, while the document “Overview of Tests for SARS-COV-2” has been replaced. According to the analysis, a link to the document “Opening America again” was also removed from the site.

Walensky noted in the review that “there was no consistent practice of disseminating supporting evidence in a scientific summary in conjunction with all important new guidelines.” But, she added, “We are now committed to providing up-to-date scientific summaries if there is research to inform guidance updates.”

Walensky wrote that the CDC “will finalize the production and revisions of the remaining new prioritized guidelines” in the coming weeks. Walensky made several recommendations for moving forward, including making it clear what scientific evidence was used for the major new guidance documents, as well as planning briefings for the media when new guidance is released, along with several other recommendations.

This is a last-minute story and will be updated.

.Source