As top US officials prepare to meet their Chinese counterparts at their first face-to-face meeting during the Biden administration, the former State Department principal investigator who oversaw the Task Force on the origin of the COVID-19 virus told the Fox News that he not only believes the virus escaped the Wuhan Institute of Virology, but may have been the result of research that the Chinese military, or the People’s Liberation Army, was doing with a biological weapon.
“The Wuhan Institute of Virology is not the National Institute of Health,” David Asher, now a senior member of the Hudson Institute, told Fox News in an exclusive interview. “I was operating a classified classified program. In my opinion, and I’m just a person, my opinion is that it was a biological weapons program.”
Asher has long been a “money-tracking” guy who has worked on some of the most confidential intelligence investigations for the State Department and the Treasury under the Democratic and Republican governments. He led the team that discovered the international nuclear procurement network run by the father of Pakistan’s nuclear program, AQ Khan, and discovered important parts of North Korea’s secret uranium enrichment. He believes that the Chinese Communist Party has been involved in a major cover-up during the past 14 months.
“And if you believe, like me, that this may have been a vector of weapons that went wrong, it was not deliberately released, but in development and somehow leaked, it ended up being the greatest weapon in history,” said Asher during a panel discussion at the Hudson Institute: The origins of COVID-10: Policy implications and lessons for the future. “You have taken 15 to 20 percent of global GDP. You have killed millions of people. The Chinese population has hardly been affected. Their economies have returned to the top spot in the entire G20.”
WHO IS CHINA CORONAVIRUS PROBE ACTIVATES REACTION
Asher says the Chinese government’s behavior reminds him of other criminal investigations he oversaw.
“Motive, cover-up, conspiracy, all the marks of guilt are associated with that. And the fact that the initial group of victims surrounded the very institute that was doing the highly dangerous, if not doubtful, research is significant,” said Asher, who hired the Chinese government as the principal representative of the State Department during the SARS outbreak in 2003.
At first, China said that the COVID19 virus originated at the Wuhan Seafood Market – but the problem with China’s theory: the first case had no connection with the market. Last fall, the U.S. obtained information indicating that there was an outbreak among several Wuhan laboratory scientists with flu-like symptoms that left them hospitalized in November 2019 – before China reported its first case. Asher and the other experts at the Hudson Institute panel said that in 2007, China announced that it would start working on genetic bio-weapons using controversial “function gain” research to make viruses more lethal.
CORONAVIRUS CASES IN CHINA: IS THE COMMUNIST REGIME LYING FOR THE WORLD?
The Chinese stopped talking publicly about their research at the Wuhan laboratory in 2016. It was then, Asher believes, that the People’s Liberation Army intervened and moved from bio-defense to bio-offensive research. In the same year, the main commentator on China’s state television said:
“We entered an area of Chinese biological warfare, including the use of things like viruses. I mean, they made a public statement to their people that this is a new priority for national security policy Xi, ”says Asher.
The Chinese, according to Asher, stopped talking publicly about research into the coronavirus “disease vectors that could be used for weapons” in 2017, at the same time that their military began funding research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
“I doubt it’s a coincidence,” said Asher.
Meanwhile, US biological weapons researchers are still focused primarily on older biological weapons, such as anthrax. A crucial point in the search for how to defend against coronavirus bioarms included the controversial “gain in function” research and a breakthrough in the Netherlands that took the scientific community by surprise.
“I remember I was at a meeting in The Hague with the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs the day the news broke that a laboratory in the Netherlands funded by the National Institutes of Health was conducting a function-gaining survey on highly pathogenic avian influenza , specifically to increase the transmissibility of that very dangerous flu virus, “recalled Andy Weber, the former Deputy Defense Secretary for President Obama’s Nuclear, Chemical and Biological Defense Programs.
The Obama administration quickly imposed a moratorium on this type of research, fearing it could become a handbook for terrorists. The Trump administration suspended the moratorium in 2017, but suspended NIH funding to the Wuhan lab in April 2020, after the pandemic began.
Biosafety has been a concern over China’s level 4 biosafety laboratories, according to experts.
“China has been involved in this type of virus research since 2003, the SARS outbreak,” according to Miles Yu, the State Department official who co-wrote a recent WSJ article with former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo about the virus origins. “China’s biosafety standard is very low and very dangerous. So this is an accident about to happen.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APPLICATION
When the team sent by WHO to Wuhan in February visited the Wuhan Institute of Virology, they did not wear biosafety clothes and spent 3 hours inside, but according to reports they did not have access to the scientists or data they needed to discard it entirely. the virus escaped the laboratory.
At the time, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin said, “It should be noted that traceability of the virus is a complex scientific issue and we need to provide enough space for experts to conduct scientific research.” He added: “China will continue to cooperate with WHO in an open, transparent and accountable manner and to make its contribution to better preventing future risks and protecting the lives and health of people in all countries.”