
Illustration: 731
It’s hard to pinpoint exactly where things with Facebook and Apple went wrong, but like so many relationships that went sour, the first signs of real problems seemed to be petty complaints. In March 2018, Facebook Inc. was in the middle of a scandal involving political consultancy Cambridge Analytica and faced serious doubts about the administration of its users’ personal data. An MSNBC commenter asked Apple Inc. CEO Tim Cook, what would he do if he were in place of Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg. “I wouldn’t be in this situation,” said Cook.
A week later, Zuckerberg hinted that Apple products were only for “rich people”. Then Apple showed a feature to help phone users reduce time spent on applications. “If you see an app that you might want to spend a little less time on, you can set your own limit,” said an Apple executive, as the Instagram app appeared on a big screen behind him.
Competition in Silicon Valley can be brutal, but for much of the past decade, Apple and Facebook have shared a mutually beneficial, though not always friendly, relationship. Facebook depends on Apple’s iPhones to reach millions of users, and Apple needs Facebook’s hugely popular apps on their phones to prevent people from accessing competing platforms. Both companies have prospered since the launch of the iPhone and, for the most part, have not made products that compete directly.

Zuckerberg testified by videoconference during a hearing of the Subcommittee on Administrative, Commercial and Antitrust Law in Washington on July 29, 2020.
Photographer: Graeme Jennings / Pool / Getty Images
But Facebook and Apple are on a collision course. Their messaging competition has heated up for years. Facebook is focusing on products that are also in the Apple script, like augmented and virtual reality headsets. “We increasingly see Apple as one of our biggest competitors,” Zuckerberg told analysts in January. “Apple has every incentive to use its dominant position on the platform to interfere with the way our apps and other apps work, which they do regularly to give preference to theirs.”
The dispute has escalated rapidly with Apple’s next update to the software that powers its iPhones, which includes the requirement that developers obtain explicit permission to collect certain data and track user activity on applications and websites. Such a move can undermine the effectiveness of Facebook targeted ads. In December, Facebook ran full-page ads in a trio of American newspapers saying it was “taking on Apple by small businesses everywhere” by opposing the changes, which it described as an abuse of market power. Facebook is considering opening an antitrust suit against Apple, according to a person familiar with the company’s thinking.
Apple says the software update will give users more clarity about who is collecting their data and why. He describes privacy as a “fundamental human right” – and his record on the issue is a way of differentiating himself Alphabet Inc.’s Google, which makes Android the software that powers most non-Apple smartphones.
Cook looked like take a look at Facebook on January 28 at the Online Conference on Computers, Privacy and Data Protection. “If a business is built on deceptive users, on data exploitation, on choices that are not choices at all, then it doesn’t deserve our praise, it deserves reform,” he said. Cook added that some social networks facilitate the spread of dangerous misinformation and conspiracy theories for user involvement. “It is past time to stop pretending that this approach does not come at a cost – of polarization, of loss of confidence, but of violence,” he said.

Cook spoke during an event at the Steve Jobs Theater in Cupertino, California, on September 10, 2019.
Photographer: David Paul Morris / Bloomberg
Discussions between the two companies over updating the software were unproductive, says Graham Mudd, vice president of advertising and business product marketing at Facebook. He says that attempts by Facebook and others to discuss the software update with Apple “have failed”. “Apple did not respond, in any way or with any degree of collaboration.”
The recent outbreak is now centered on the pop-up text that leads iPhone users to decide whether to allow tracking. Facebook executives fear that Apple will structure the choice in an alarmist way, effectively leading users to reject tracking. Facebook’s chief financial officer, Dave Wehner, told analysts that he expects “high exclusion rates” for Apple’s request, and Facebook said that these changes will impact its business in the future. She plans to lead the Apple prompt with her own messages, framing advertising as a way to have a better Facebook experience and to support companies that rely on sales-targeted ads.
Whatever the outcome, the dispute points to more tension ahead. Elizabeth Renieris, a data protection and privacy lawyer who runs the Notre Dame-IBM Technology Ethics Lab, says the conflict over tracking exposed how much the two companies dominate their respective markets, which can be problematic, as both are under antitrust scrutiny. Facebook’s argument that small businesses will not be able to reach customers after these changes demonstrates how critical it is in the world of small business advertising, she says. Apple’s claim that it should create and enforce industry-standard rules on user privacy illustrates its uncanny influence in the smartphone market.
“They are assuming their continued dominance for the next decade or more. They are already talking about their next rivalry, ”she says, referring to Facebook. “It is quite insane to me that they would publicly air all of this.”
US Opinion, 2020
Details: YouGov
Zuckerberg warned analysts last month about “a very significant competitive overlap” in the years to come. Facebook has three messaging products with more than a billion users each – WhatsApp, Messenger and Instagram – that compete with Apple’s iMessage. Zuckerberg accused Apple in late January of giving its own app unfair advantages over competitors, although he also pointed to the success of iMessage as a way of proving that Facebook has no monopoly on private messaging.
The two companies will compete in hardware when Apple launches a virtual reality device to rival Facebook’s Oculus Quest headset as early as next year. Both companies are also developing their own augmented reality glasses, although these are even further away. Apple and Facebook are also starting to compete at home. Facebook now has a variety of smart home devices for video chat that somehow compete with Apple’s TV set-top box, HomePod speaker and iPads for FaceTime.
Given its damaged reputation, Facebook is at a serious disadvantage in the fight for privacy, and Zuckerberg tried to emphasize what he considers the non-benevolent motives behind the phone maker’s business decisions. “Apple can say that it is doing this to help people, but the movements clearly track their competitive interests,” he said on January 27. “I think this dynamic is important for people to understand, because we and others are going to face this in the foreseeable future. “
(Updates the 13th paragraph with more information on the areas in which Facebook and Apple compete. An earlier version corrected the name of the Notre Dame-IBM Technology Ethics Laboratory in the tenth paragraph. )
BOTTOM LINE –
In general, Apple and Facebook have stayed away from direct competition, but their discussion of data collection is a sign that this is changing.